The media maelstrom continues tenaciously. Was FTVS culturally, ethnically, dare we say it, racially insensitive when using the term mulatto in its most recent exposé on Obama’s groundbreaking trip to San Francisco?

Let us be pellucidly clear: FTVS endorses President Barack Obama. Let us expand upon this unprecedented salience: FTVS endorses multi-racial sex parties and multi-racial marriage and also multi-racial reproduction — why else would Tiger Woods be on our advisory board?

FTVS believes that the world would be a much more gratifying locale were all generative procreations conducted by people of heterogeneous progenies! What does that mean? That interracial sexing is superior and exquisite, of course.

Consider what racially uniform reproduction brought us: Tara Reid, Adolf Hitler, Whoopi Goldberg, Ashton Kutcher, Star Jones, Michael Moore, Kim Jong Il — the list of human stains flows relentlessly from the gates of phyletic singularity.

Sweet Rashida, delivering her trademark come-hither gaze to Jack Colt (sex only).

Now consider what bi/multi-racial copulation has brought us: Rashida Jones. See the picture to your left for evidence of the strong and violently positive correlation between racially incongruous coition and epicurean symmetry. Need more evidence? Lou Diamond Philips. Delicious. More yet? Alicia Keys. Dear lord, her rotund ass is a smörgåsbord of miracles!

So what is the point, aside from all the points we have already made?

It is whether or not the term mulatto is racist, of course. FTVS thinks it is more a compliment than a derogation, but also knows that etymology can be a bitch.

Please click here and here for answers to the questions FTVS has already answered for you. A groundbreaking statistically economic model was developed to acquire the world’s foremost experts on racial archetypes and etymological quandaries, thus all answers provided by Yahoo are irrevocably unreliable.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.